![]() ![]() This is the first game in the Civilization catalog to be developed and available exclusively for mobile devices. The sequel to one of the most successful strategy games on mobile is here! Sid Meier's Civilization Revolution 2 challenges players to build a glorious empire that will stand the test of time. ![]() If not, at least you supported it so that one day I might see another console release, and I appreciate your contribution.***NOTE: Compatible with iPhone 4S+, iPad 2+, iPad mini 1+, and iPod touch 5 - WILL NOT RUN ON EARLIER DEVICES*** My advice to you is to drop the $15 just to see if you're like me and find civ rev to be one of the best games of all time. ![]() ![]() Other than that it's probably the most fun and complex game for the iPhone, a hidden gem behind all the haters. The main thing that is really disappointing is that there is no multiplayer. This game is brilliantly tactical and a whole lot of fun. Its very disappointing - if civ rev was not made by Sid Meier and people dint expect it to be something different it could flourish. Every civ is just as aggressive and difficult to dominate as the consoles. The IGN review is total bogus - I never had one second of slowdown on an iPhone 4S with 20+ cities to control. Playing with your back against the wall and still emerging is deeply satisfying for veteran players. The game is so brilliant and complex that if you are really good you can still win regularly when all your opponents have an unfair advantage. Once you get good at the game you always win on Emperor so you move to Diety where the computer has an unfair advantage. New players should not be playing on the hardest difficulty. This will annoy die hard fans but its not game breaking. The only thing you cant see mt do is micro-mange your city, you have to pick a general focus such as food or production. Its pretty easy to play once you get the hang of it. There are several subtle balance changes, such as city with walls with a ranged unit can make a ranged attack so you aren't so devastated by a naval assault, and I never got an option to flip a city using a great person. There seems to be only minor changes, such as a slightly smaller world, 5 player games and military units are in groups of 1-3 (A unit of 9 has 9 "heath bars" under it but is only represented in battle by 3 units). Playing the same game that I have for PS3 on my iPhone 4s is pretty crazy. Civ rev is flashy, colorful, fast-paced (only compared to civ) and no less as complex and brilliant as any civ game. Then there are players who never really got into civ on the PC for various reasons: they are very slow paced with games spanning weeks, nothing really flashy or exciting is happening. They are turned off by it from the get go and play it with a chip on their shoulder and write angry 1-3 score reviews. These players hate Civ Rev because its too "simple" and games are too "quick" and the computer "cheats". These There are 2 kinds of Civ players: PC fans who grew up playing 40 hour games of civ and love its slow pace and deep complexity. There are 2 kinds of Civ players: PC fans who grew up playing 40 hour games of civ and love its slow pace and deep complexity. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |